Amongst other things, the purpose of this blog is to try to destroy stereotypes, ones Brazilians have of Americans and more importantly, ones Americans have of Brazilians. It seems to me that Americans have such a skewed view of Brazil not necessarily due to a lack of information, but also because the mainstream media perpetuates stereotypes. As such, many Americans assume Brazil is a beach-lined jungle full of naked women samba-ing while men bounce soccer balls off of their heads.
Let's take a look at this week's TIME article about Lula, who is not only the president of Brazil but in my humble opinion, one of the most important and best presidents in Brazilian history. So how did the reporter begin the article about such a man?
"With their endless string of pearl beaches, heavenly climate and sensual bossa nova culture, Brazilians consider themselves uniquely blessed. So when the first of two gigantic oil fields was discovered off the coast near Rio de Janeiro last fall, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva saw it simply as further proof of a celestial bond. "God," Lula gushed, 'is Brazilian.'"
Besides listing the obvious stereotypes the reporter pulls out of his seriously uninformed ass, there are the usual culprits: "sensual," "string" (because what image does this word really conjure up?), and "gushed." Presidents don't gush. They just don't.
But this has got to be one of the most ridiculous lines I've read in a major American publication about Brazil:
The oil find could make Brazil one of the world's largest crude producers, but even without that bounty, the economy has been growing as vigorously as a guava tree in the Amazon rain forest, allowing Brazil to start reducing its epic social inequality.
Are you shitting me? I suppose I could compare the US economy to a slimy mole, digging itself deeper and deeper into the ground, but the New York Times certainly wouldn't publish that.
At least the writer salvages the last shred of his journalistic integrity by accurately listing some of Brazil's problems, but finished the article on such an obnoxious note:
Taxes are exorbitant, Amazon deforestation is rising again, and Brazil has one of the world's most wasteful public bureaucracies. To fix all those problems in two years would require much more divine intervention.
You know what else is in need of divine intervention, buddy? Your writing.
gush. hehe.
i think he's just trying to be more lyrical, news reporters get bored, they really want to be poets and novelists.
:)
Posted by: mallory elise | October 04, 2008 at 12:20 PM
I don't get any surprised with stereotypes, at least not after that infamous Simpsons episode.
And I really don't care, either, because there are always people who knows about this being...Absurd.
=**
Posted by: Raquel Keshi | October 04, 2008 at 04:28 PM
hehe! I love you!
Posted by: Christina | October 04, 2008 at 04:54 PM
Espero que seu olho esteja OK agora! Conseguiu ver algo do festival do Rio de cinema?
Posted by: Marcelo | October 05, 2008 at 01:22 AM
hehe! I love you![2]
Posted by: david | October 27, 2008 at 11:41 PM
just got here after seeing the highlight on yahoo this morning. great blog and writing, keep it up!
this time article is, as many others are, so much biased. it seems to me that these people writing still believe that brazil is only about amazonia, rio, soccer, samba and caipirinha, and everything else that don't fit any of these is just some eccentric coincidence. i still believe, though, it's not entirely the journalist's fault, since many of us don't really do much to fight this stereotype; in fact, it seems that some people are even proud of it. how other people see our country is, in much extent, how we want them to see, so it's up to us to show them something else. of course, a little bit of journalistic research wouldn't hurt either.
kind regards, roberta
Posted by: Roberta Zouain | October 28, 2008 at 08:25 AM